Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior
Date
Msg-id 18725.1170659809@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior  (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>)
Responses Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior
List pgsql-general
Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> writes:
> As I already said - it works until I create a rule for the next
> partition (not used yet) - then is suddenly stops working.

Suddenly stops working, or continues doing exactly what it did before?
I'm wondering if you are relying on a cached plan that doesn't include
the new rule.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR: missing cache data for cache id 27