Re: size of function body - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: size of function body
Date
Msg-id 18916.1026842650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to size of function body  (Ralph Graulich <maillist@shauny.de>)
Responses Re: size of function body
List pgsql-general
Ralph Graulich <maillist@shauny.de> writes:
> after some fooling around I figured out that a function body can't be
> larger than the defined postgres' block size, which defaults to 8192
> byte.

Say what?  That hasn't been true since TOAST was introduced in 7.1.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Gregory Wood"
Date:
Subject: Re: table size growing out of control
Next
From: Jeff Boes
Date:
Subject: Make psql 7.2 \d work like 7.1?