Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
Date
Msg-id 19003.1540370028@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Responses Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
List pgsql-general
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> While reloading a database cluster to move from 10.5 to 11, I'm getting
> out of memory crashes that I did see when doing reloads on pg 10.
> The statement flagged in the log is this:
> 2018-10-23 16:44:34.815 CDT [126839] STATEMENT:  ALTER TABLE ONLY public.iplocation
>         ADD CONSTRAINT overlap EXCLUDE USING spgist (network WITH &&);

Hm, there's a fair amount of new code in SP-GIST in v11, so maybe you've
hit a memory leak in that.  Can you create a self-contained test case?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Schneider
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PG
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?