Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall
Date
Msg-id 19243.1516550549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes betweenpg_dump and pg_dumpall  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall
Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes betweenpg_dump and pg_dumpall
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:54:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Command was: DROP DATABASE "template1";

> Uh, the oid of the template1 database is 1, and I assume we would want
> to preserve that too.

I don't feel any huge attachment to that.  In the first place, under
this proposal recreating template1 is something you would only need to do
if you weren't satisfied with its default properties as set by initdb.
Which ought to be a minority of users.  In the second place, if you are
changing those properties from the way initdb set it up, it's not really
virgin template1 anymore, so why shouldn't it have a new OID?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes betweenpg_dump and pg_dumpall
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Supporting huge pages on Windows