Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
>>> commands sent with \g use a cursor.
> I am confused. I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says.
> Tom, what *every* command are you talking about? You mean \d?
Like I said, I thought we were intending to modify \g's behavior only;
that was certainly the implication of the discussion of "\gc".
regards, tom lane
