Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP
Date
Msg-id 199801050508.AAA27861@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > >
> > > On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just remember that Informix (and others) use 2K blocks.
> > >
> > >     So we're 4x what the commercial ones are as of right now?
> >
> > That is because they do not use the file system, so they try to match
> > the raw disk block sizes, while we try to match the file system size.
>
>     Irrelevant to my question...our tuples...are they 4x the size of the
> commercial vendors, or is Vadim talking about something altogether different?
>
>     If we are 4x their size, then I think this whole discussion is a joke since
> we are already *way* better then "the others"

That's a good question.  What is the maximum tuple size for Informix or
Oracle tuples?

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: subselect
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Snapshot(s)