>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Remember me? Remember I was bitching about hashed and indexes scans not
> being indexed?
>
> Guess what - it magically fixed itself.
>
> If you want to talk about things that *bother* me, this one tops the pack.
>
> The same query now returns an index hash query plan, which executes in a few
> seconds and requires little memory (as opposed to looped sequential scans
> requiring 500MB on the server).
>
> This is really, really, odd.
Vacuum? Vacuum analyze? Improper index?
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
