Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)
Date
Msg-id 199808232212.SAA23787@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> OK, I've just committed to the source tree changes for looking for
> binary-compatible indices when either the left- or right-hand side of
> the restriction clause is a constant.
>
> I've #ifndef'd them so we can disable it if necessary. But, all of the
> regression tests pass, except for the select_view test, which has been
> core dumping for weeks. Anyone else seeing that, or is it just me? :(

Is this fixed?  Are there any open problems with the regress tests?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf'd test for int64