Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Date
Msg-id 1b1c24c24132fca21f88209aaeaf5fbedd1c35ca.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0  (Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 17:06 -0800, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> FWIW, after adding ICU support I personally don't think there's a
> pressing need to continue updating the tables anymore.

I agree that it's not a pressing concern.

> If Postgres does go the path of multiple tables, does the community
> want to accumulate a new set of tables every year? That could add up
> quickly. Maybe we don't add new tables every year, but follow the
> examples of Oracle and DB2 in accumulating them on a less frequent
> basis?

Yeah, it would probably be every-other-release or something. By the
time we built up enough versions for someone to worry about, hopefully
we'd have some better systems in place to track versions and migrate
forward.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_createsubscriber TAP test wrapping makes command options hard to read.
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation