Re: SQL:2011 application time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date
Msg-id 1b45f81d-4e99-4813-a2c6-72bf5fd80980@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL:2011 application time  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
Responses Re: SQL:2011 application time
Re: SQL:2011 application time
List pgsql-hackers
On 12.01.25 00:19, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> On 1/4/25 13:39, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
>> These updates fix a problem in the unaccent contrib module. When I 
>> added a new parameter to get_func_namespace, I changed a call there. 
>> Then I when took out that parameter, I didn't update the extension 
>> again. Otherwise these are the same as the v46 patches.
> 
> Hi Hackers,
> 
> Here is another set of commits. Based on discussion on the thread about 
> Index AM API Cleanup [1], I decided that I should just always make FOR 
> PORTION OF infer its intersect proc from whatever intersect op is used 
> by temporal foreign keys (even though we don't have a way to get an 
> intersect op for non-range/multirange types yet). This means we need one 
> less GiST support proc, which seems like a nice improvement.
> 
> I also fixed the RESTRICT commit where a change previously was included 
> in a later commit that should have been included there.
> 
> Rebased to 29dfffae0a, fixing a merge conflict + crash with the NOT 
> ENFORCED commit.

I have committed the fix for foreign key NO ACTION (patch 0002, this did 
not require patch 0001).  I will study the proposed fix for RESTRICT 
(patches 0001 and 0003) next.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: New feature request for adding session information to PostgreSQL transaction log
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel heap vacuum