Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21
Date
Msg-id 1b9ee295-8cf8-4a94-87c8-f10e08cb5292@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21  (Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12.09.25 09:47, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>  As a small style request, I would flip the conditional around so
>> that the new code appears first.  I see that we don't do this very
>> consistently in the existing code, but maybe we can start a new
>> trend. ;-)
> I knew this would come up since I pondered the same thing :D
> As you said, the existing code is not consistent, but I can switch this
> to let the new code appear first, if you prefer.
> A new patch is attached.

I have committed this one.  For the remaining issue on arm, let's wait 
for some additional reviews.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix missing EvalPlanQual recheck for TID scans
Next
From: Чумак Антон
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Introduce unified support for composite GUC options