Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Erik Rijkers
Subject Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Date
Msg-id 1f74c7cb3b4bdcd668d03ab789f1b242.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, August 10, 2010 13:18, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:13:22PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
>> switches as well as pg_dump?
>>
>>     $ pg_restore -t tbl1 -t tbl2 db.dump
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Yes. :)
>
> What other functionality in pg_dump does pg_restore not duplicate?
>

See also "pg_restore -t table : can silently omit constraints":
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-04/msg00269.php

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf