> >*) The overhead for non-inheritance has
> >been cut down to 30 microseconds (on a pc).
We actually have to see how you have implemented it. I am not so
interested in timings as in your method. It can be done fast, or it can
be done sloppy. I will check the patch.
> And if SQL92 compliance is the goal, why must ANY degradation
> of performance be acceptable unless there are very, very strong
> reasons to do so (reasons that impact the target audience).
Agreed.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
