Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs
Date
Msg-id 200002052201.RAA07126@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Looks great.  I wouldn't change a thing in your proposal.

> I am about to implement some changes to the planner/optimizer's cost
> model, following up to the thread on pghackers beginning on 20 Jan.
> The main conclusion of that thread was that we needed to charge more for
> a page fetched nonsequentially than for a page fetched sequentially.
> After further investigation I have concluded that it is also appropriate
> to include explicit modeling of the cost of evaluation of WHERE clauses.
> For example, using the regression database and a query like
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Spoke too soon (was RE: cvs committers digest)