Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
Date
Msg-id 200002280911.EAA20843@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
> > > > If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.
> > >
> > >     Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0.
> >
> > But we just required initdb for lztext.  If we need another initdb
> > later, maybe we should do it?
> 
>     LZTEXT  was  a  fairly  limited change, tested out before and
>     just reapplied. This time you ask for mucking with the family
>     of  node-print  and  -read  functions. Even if it's a limited
>     area of code affected, I don't feel comfortable doing it now.

OK. Added to TODO.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?