Re: [BUGS] 7.0beta1: bugs appearing on cygwin - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [BUGS] 7.0beta1: bugs appearing on cygwin |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200002281722.MAA06412@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | 7.0beta1: bugs appearing on cygwin (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>) |
Responses |
Re: [BUGS] 7.0beta1: bugs appearing on cygwin
|
List | pgsql-bugs |
> System Configuration > --------------------- > Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : Intel Pentium 100 > > Operating System (example: Linux 2.0.26 ELF) : winnt4/cygwin 20.1 > > PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-6.5.2): PostgreSQL-7.0beta1 > > Compiler used (example: gcc 2.8.0) : egcs-2.91.57 (cygwin default) > > Please enter a FULL description of your problem: > ------------------------------------------------ > > 1) ecpg does not honour HAVE_SNPRINTF being undefined. make fails :( > ---- > gcc -o ecpg preproc.o pgc.o type.o ecpg.o ecpg_keywords.o output.o keywords.o c_keywords.o ../lib/typename.o descriptor.ovariable. > -L/usr/local/lib -lcrypt -lm -lreadline -ltermcap -lncurses -lcygipc -g > descriptor.o: In function `ECPGnumeric_lvalue': > /home/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/descriptor.c:55: undefined reference to `snprintf' > descriptor.o: In function `ECPGstring_buffer': > /home/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/descriptor.c:78: undefined reference to `snprintf' > descriptor.o: In function `ECPGstring_length': > /home/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/descriptor.c:94: undefined reference to `snprintf' > /home/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/descriptor.c:101: undefined reference to `snprintf' > descriptor.o: In function `ECPGdata_assignment': > /home/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/descriptor.c:152: undefined reference to `snprintf' > descriptor.o:/home/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/descriptor.c:165: more undefined references to `snprintf' follow > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[3]: *** [ecpg] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make: *** [all] Error 2 > ---- OK, I am confused. We have HAVE_SNPRINTF, but I don't see it being used anywhere. Is it still relivant to our code? Does NT not have snprintf? > 2) gcc warns about redefine of CURRENT_TIME. Nothing > serious (I mean the compile does not fail..), I just thought I mention. > > defined in backend/parse.h & <sys/ipc.h> (cygwin32_ipc-1.03) > > ok, I chacked. In different .c files they are included in different > order. > > ipc.h: #define CURRENT_TIME time(0) Seems this is getting in our way. We could try undefining it before defining it, I guess. I don't think it affects the compile. > parse.h: #define CURRENT_TIME 287 > > How it affects the program, I do not know. Maybe this is serious... > > > Please describe a way to repeat the problem. Please try to provide a > concise reproducible example, if at all possible: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > snoopy$ uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-4.0 SNOOPY 20.1 (0.3/1/1) 1998-12-3 20:39:18 i586 unknown > snoopy$ make Running NT. I know it works on that because we have gotten patches from people. > Is this really the Right Thing(tm) to have bug-reporting list > available only to subscribers? I mean it should be encouraged to > be on list but enforced? There should be decent anti-spam software > floating around? > </offtopic> The bugs list is open to anyone, right? It should be. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
pgsql-bugs by date: