Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 200004141723.NAA06939@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?  (Frank Bax <fbax@execulink.com>)
Responses Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?
List pgsql-general
> >From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/user/sql-vacuum.htm
> >
> >VACUUM serves two purposes in Postgres as both a means to reclaim
> >storage and also a means to collect information for the optimizer.
>
> I'm guessing here, but it would seem to me that once the 'reclaim' portion
> was written, it probably seemed like a good a place as any to put the
> stat-collecting code?  As long as the entire database was being scanned
> anyway, why not collect statistics.

Yes, that was the idea.  While doing one, why not do the other.

>
> Perhaps its time for the two functions to be separated - controlled by an
> option?
> Perhaps VACUUM STATONLY could collect stats, not lock table and not reclaim
> space.

Makes sense.

> Actually, I'm thinking any seq-scan could collect the stats on the way
> through?

We have thought about that, at least to count the number of rows.


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?