Re: Now 376175 lines of code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Now 376175 lines of code |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200010200129.VAA00511@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Now 376175 lines of code (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Now 376175 lines of code
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
FYI, it is 376k lines of C code, not bytes. [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > What is amazing, is that you can make such complete system on Linux with > only 376k of code... > > I think bloated software is not part of your dictionnary, and that's good... > > Franck Martin > Database Development Officer > SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission > Fiji > E-mail: franck@sopac.org <mailto:franck@sopac.org> > Web site: http://www.sopac.org/ <http://www.sopac.org/> > > This e-mail is intended for its recipients only. Do not forward this > e-mail without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be > neccessarily the views of SOPAC. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:03 PM > To: Ross J. Reedstrom > Cc: Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Now 376175 lines of code > > > Never mind. I see I ran it already on 7.0 and got 376k. You used my > idential script to get these numbers. I will use your nice numbers for > a presentation at the show in two weeks. Thanks a lot. > > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:45:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > I did a distclean on 7.0, and ran 'wc' on all the *.[chly] files, and > > > > got a much larger number than what we got from Berkeley. > > > > 376175 > > > > Seems someone has been busy. :-) > > > > > > Forgive a newbie --- what was the count for the original Berkeley code? > > > Do you have the same numbers for other milestones? > > > > Not that I'm a big believer in kloc as a measure of productivity (oh, > > Bruce just said busy, didn't he? That's a different story...), I happen > > to have a couple historical trees laying around, starting with the last > > one I found at Berkeley: > > > > postgres-v4r2 244581 > > postgres95-1.09 178976 > > postgresql-6.1.1 200709 > > postgresql-6.3.2 260809 > > postgresql-6.4.0 297479 > > postgresql-6.4.2 297918 > > postgresql-6.5.3 331278 > > > > Well, more than a couple trees, I guess (actually I unpacked tarballs > > for most of these) > > > > HTH, > > Ross > > -- > > Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> > > NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer > > Computer and Information Technology Institute > > Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005 > > > > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
pgsql-hackers by date: