Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
Subject Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date
Msg-id 200011110509.XAA19353@selkovjr.xnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1  (Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Mark Hollomon wrote:

> Correct. I don't know why anyone would want to change the definition of
> (say) int48eq, but if we are going to allow them to do so, we should be
> careful to allow them to backup and restore such a change.

Yes, and it is also important that if such weirdos exist, they are
allowed to backup this type of change separately from the databases.

--Gene

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)