Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Florent Guillaume
Subject Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?
Date
Msg-id 20010120143253.A17788@twin.efge.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?  ("rob" <rob@cabrion.com>)
List pgsql-general
> currval returns error unless nextval has been called at least once in the
> session.

But in my example, which is

> > > create table t1 (recordid SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, val INT4, name TEXT);
> > > ... much later ...
> > > insert into t1 (val, name) values (3465, 'blah');
> > > -- now we want the recordid just created

it's ok because a NULL insert into a SERIAL implicitly calls nextval.


Florent

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joseph"
Date:
Subject: Re: Can't set MAX_CONNECTIONS over 32
Next
From: Richard Seymour
Date:
Subject: Re: couple of general questions