Solaris problems (was Re: SPARC Solaris 8 OK) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mathijs Brands
Subject Solaris problems (was Re: SPARC Solaris 8 OK)
Date
Msg-id 20010328023600.A98674@ilse.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to SPARC Solaris 8 OK  (Brian P Millett <bpm@ec-group.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:34:13AM -0600, Brian P Millett allegedly wrote:
> ======================
>  All 76 tests passed.
> ======================
> 
> vlad: uname -a
> SunOS vlad 5.8 Generic_108528-06 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> 
> Reading specs from /opt/sfw/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.2/specs
> gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> 
> CFLAGS=-O6 -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa
> CXXFLAGS=-O6 -felide-constructors -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa
> 
> configure --prefix=/opt/pgsql \
>                --with-tcl \
>                --with-includes=/opt/sfw/include \
>                --with-libraries=/opt/sfw/lib \
>                --with-tclconfig=/opt/sfw/lib \
>                --with-CC=gcc \
>                --with-CXX=gcc
> 
> This was cvs checjout this am (3/27/2001)
> 
> Thanks.

Erm, I've just tested 7.1RC1 on Solaris 8 x86 and SPARC. Solaris x86
works without any problems and passes the regression test (apart from
a few very small roundoff errors in the geometry tests). However, on
Solaris SPARC tests randomly fail (like someone else reported too). I've
tried running configure without any options and the options given above,
but the results were the same. I'm using gcc 2.95.3. I'll see if I can
give the cvs version and gcc 2.95.2 a try tomorrow. Same goes for
Solaris 7 SPARC and maybe Solaris 2.6 SPARC.

Cheers,

Mathijs
-- 
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.                                                   Erik Naggum


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: IANA registration
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: IANA registration