Re: More Red Hat information - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | wsheldah@lexmark.com |
---|---|
Subject | Re: More Red Hat information |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200106261558.LAA26704@interlock2.lexmark.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | More Red Hat information (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: More Red Hat information
Re: More Red Hat information |
List | pgsql-general |
I agree. How is a person supposed to count the number of users if the database is being used to support a public dynamic web site? Is the company supposed to buy a separate license for every unique IP address that ever hits a dynamic web page on the site? I can see licensing per server, or even per CPU, but licensing any server application per user quickly becomes ridiculous when the server is supporting any internet application. martin.chantler%convergys.com@interlock.lexmark.com on 06/26/2001 11:14:13 AM To: pgsql-general%postgresql.org@interlock.lexmark.com cc: (bcc: Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: Re: [GENERAL] More Red Hat information Hmm, M$ SQL may be a few hundered $ for a couple of user licenses but last time I looked it was at least £7000 (about $10,000?) for a 100 user license. Thats not the enterprise edition either. In my experience DB pricing structures seem to be a mystery whichever platform you look at :) MC. > At 8:57 -0700 2001-06-25, David Wheeler wrote: > >On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >> Here is a link with more information than the press release: > >> > >> http://www.redhat.com/products/software/database/ > > > >$2225 ???? Are they *kidding*??? > > If they really deliver, i.e. you get reasonable phone+email support > from people who can actually _do_something_ instead of giving you the > runaround (phoned M$ tech support lately with a _real_ bug report? > *), it's cheap as dirt as databases go. M$ is a good example, as their database is quite capable, and costs only a few hundred bucks (last time I looked). If RedHat DB is three times the price, IME many PHBs will go with SQL Server, instead, just because it's cheaper, and they know the Microsoft name (and FUD). David -- David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory David@Wheeler.net ICQ: 15726394 Yahoo!: dew7e Jabber: Theory@jabber.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by Convergys Corporation for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email or by telephone (collect), so that the sender's address records can be corrected. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
pgsql-general by date: