Re: Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin - Mailing list pgsql-cygwin
From | Terry Carlin |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20010717.15511700@tcarlinpc.us.greatbridge.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin (Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin
|
List | pgsql-cygwin |
Yes, I would like you to send me the Cygwin DLL. I downloaded the most current snapshot. The benchmarks that I am doing don't seem to drop any tables, but just in case.... It seems that the problem that I was seeing with the handles has indeed been fixed. Was able to run a 20 user benchmark yesterday. This takes around three hours. The throughput seemed to be at least in the neighborhood of RedHat 7.1 Linux 2.4.2 kernel. (1100 TPS on a random read-only AS3AP query). I am currently running a 1-100 user TPC-C benchmark. This will take a couple of days to run. Will let you know how it turns out. Thanks Terry Carlin VP QA Great Bridge, LLC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 7/16/01, 4:41:28 PM, Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> wrote regarding [CYGWIN] Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin: > Terry, > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 08:28:28PM +0000, Terry Carlin wrote: > > I guess I confused you. I think the snapshot that Dmitry Yurtaev > > mentioned was of Cygwin snapshot 20010615 not of PostgreSQL. > > I am downloading the latest snapshot of Cygwin as I am typing this > > message. > > Will publish my results as soon as I can get the testing in. > Does your testing do any DROP TABLE commands? If so, then please heed my > warning below: > > On 7/16/01, 1:57:22 PM, Jason.Tishler@dothill.com (Jason Tishler) wrote > > regarding Re: PostgreSQL on Cygwin: > > > > > Unfortunately, there is a bug in the current Cygwin CVS that causes > > > PostgreSQL to hang during a DROP TABLE. See the following for details: > > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2001-07/msg00070.html > > > > > I can email you a Cygwin DLL built from Cygwin CVS on 6/28/01 with the > > > problematic patch already removed or you can use the 6/16/01 snapshot > > > which is the last official snapshot that does not have this problem. > > > Either one is after 6/15/01, which Dmitry claims no longer has this > > > resource leak. Let me know which way you want to go. > Thanks, > Jason > -- > Jason Tishler > Director, Software Engineering Phone: 732.264.8770 x235 > Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: 732.264.8798 > 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com > Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
pgsql-cygwin by date: