Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Victor Wagner
Subject Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ?
Date
Msg-id 20020611201311.GA15350@ice.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 2002.06.11 at 14:43:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> > It should work (and does in current sources).  If you look in the archives
> > you should be able to get info on how to patch 7.2 (it came up recently,
> > I'm not sure which list, and Tom Lane sent the message in question).
>
> BTW, should we back-patch that into 7.2.*?  I was resistant to the idea

I would appreciate this.

I doubt that I it would fix problem with

update sometable set a=a+1

where there exist unique index on sometable(a), but it would make
postgresql behavoir closer to standard SQL.

In my (user) point of view, it is obvoisly bugfix, rather than added
feature, so it has right to appear in 7.2.x release.

> because of concern about lack of testing, but seeing that we've gotten
> several complaints maybe we should do it anyway.
--
Victor Wagner            vitus@ice.ru
Chief Technical Officer        Office:7-(095)-748-53-88
Communiware.Net         Home: 7-(095)-135-46-61
http://www.communiware.net      http://www.ice.ru/~vitus

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Referential integrity problem postgresql 7.2 ?