Re: PostgreSQL vs. SapDB slashdot discussion - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. SapDB slashdot discussion
Date
Msg-id 200207191504.g6JF4Zh07726@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. SapDB slashdot discussion  (Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>)
List pgsql-general
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:

Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 22:12, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In case anyone missed the PostgreSQL/SapDB discussion:
> >
> >     http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/16/1820219&mode=nested&tid=99
> >
> > We come out looking very good.
>
> Mostly because it degenerated in a pg-mysql comparison. It's a bit
> lacking in terms of real data about SAPDB. The bit that's there seems
> that pg and sap are quite similarly powerful.

True.  If SapDB had a larger open-source group behind it, and the source
code was easier to understand, they could be a formitable challenger to
PostgreSQL.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
Date:
Subject: Re: Looking for types: phone number, email addresses
Next
From: Devrim GUNDUZ
Date:
Subject: Re: References for PostgreSQL