Re: indisclustered and clusterdb - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: indisclustered and clusterdb
Date
Msg-id 200209030127.g831RtE10179@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: indisclustered and clusterdb  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: indisclustered and clusterdb
List pgsql-patches
Added to open items.  I wonder if vacuumdb and reindexdb are OK?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, clusterdb is not schema-aware and will surely fail in any database
> where more than one schema is in use, because it doesn't trouble to
> schema-qualify table names.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: indisclustered and clusterdb
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: indisclustered and clusterdb