Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Chris Miles
Subject Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Date
Msg-id 20021014131714.A18413@psychofx.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database  (Chris Miles <chris_pg002@psychofx.com>)
List pgsql-admin
We use V3 over TCP for our NFS mounts from Netapp.  Mount options are
actually: hard,intr,vers=3,proto=tcp,suid,rsize=32768,wsize=32768

Cheers,
CM


On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:15:15PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> I think the version of the NFS protocol you can use is =very=
> important.  For example, regarding file locking:  V1 didn't do it at all
> (every transaction was supposed to be stateless, which means persistent
> requests were just an error.  In V2, support for locking was defined, but
> many implementations always returned successful and didn't actually do
> anything.  I believe that V3 gets locking right, but I don't know about fsync.

--
Chris Miles
chris@psychofx.com
http://www.psychofx.com/chris/

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Gaetano Mendola"
Date:
Subject: Statistic collector too many fork
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistic collector too many fork