On Friday April 11 2003 10:08, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Clearly a bug, but we had memory leaks that clear up at transaction end.
That seems like yet another reason for constraining the size of a batch of
transactions.
> One of the "leaks" we still have: Constraint trigger queue.
What is that about? Or if you don't want to re-explain, what would I search
for in the archive?
Ed
