Re: perm bug ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: perm bug ?
Date
Msg-id 20030724165557.GA7206@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to perm bug ?  (ivan <iv@psycho.pl>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 00:32:32 +0200, ivan <iv@psycho.pl> wrote:
> 
> When ie function is whitout any grant == public have grant to execute it.
> public or user who have grant to usage on this func. namepsace.
> 
> I think when i create function , the default grant should be only for
> owner. specialy when function have security definer .
> 
> or , i dont know about sth like umask ???

Note that you can create and remove public access to a function in a
transaction so that there isn't a window where unauthorized people
can use the function.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq_r
Next
From: Adam Haberlach
Date:
Subject: Really odd corruption problem: cannot open pg_aggregate: No such file or directory