Re: Log rotation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: Log rotation
Date
Msg-id 200403131313.21280.lowen@pari.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Log rotation  (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: Log rotation
List pgsql-hackers
On Saturday 13 March 2004 01:00 pm, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> There are some applicatons which run in servers with very strict
> response times and any syscall, network packet that can be saved counts.

Ok, what about pipe overhead?  If we're gong to split hairs, let's split all 
of them.  The design of the pipeline in this logrotator filter will have to 
be such that minimal overhead occurs, because, at the real-time level, every 
concurrent process also counts.

> The number of generated messgaes.

> Maybe that is an area that can be worked on, i.e. reducing log
> verbosity.  Is 7.4.x much better than 7.3.x in that respect?

There are several levels documented in postgresql.conf.  Try the terse level 
and see what happens.
-- 
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Log rotation