On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:55:34AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> This thread seems to have died without a conclusion. AFAICS, we have 5
> options:
>
> . the apache program - see below
> pro: robust, portable, extremely well tested, no effort to import
> con: possible license issues, limited features
One of the folks who works with me at Afilias, Andrew Hammond, is
trying to clean up a patch he made to include the apache log rotator
"natively". We've been looking at it because I'm worried about the
I/O our current approach imposes, and we need to have something to
compare it with. I think he told me that he'll have a patch ready to
offer in a day or two. Of course, it would depend on actually having
the rotator program sitting around somewhere.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. --Philip Greenspun
