Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date
Msg-id 200411051622.55820.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
List pgsql-hackers
Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this
> discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use
> the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we
> need to change I'll take lots more notice.

I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain 
traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB 
backend that it uses.

I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally offer 
subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some developer groups 
and also our system administrators could get some experience with it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Next
From: Joachim Wieland
Date:
Subject: Documentation on PITR still scarce