Re: IBM patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: IBM patent
Date
Msg-id 20050129183128.K63001@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IBM patent  (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
Responses Re: IBM patent
Re: IBM patent
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Christopher Browne wrote:

> Actually, the latter isn't so.
>
> If Mammoth or Pervasive or such release their own release of
> PostgreSQL, nothing has historically mandated that they make that
> release available under the BSD license.
>
> Presumably acceptance of the patent would change that.
>
> You and I might not have individual objections to this situation, but
> one or another of the companies putting together PostgreSQL releases
> very well might.

But, there is nothing stop'ng them from replacing the ARC code with their 
own variant though ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: IBM patent
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Implementing Bitmap Indexes