Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is
> > enabled,
>
> I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved,
> only complicate the configuration behavior even more.
I think this is analogous to checking for snprintf() support of 64-bit
integers only if we previously found 64-bit integers to be supported.
We don't need to include our own snprintf() if we don't need the extra
features it provides.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
