Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > o patents are bad
> > o software patents are bad
>
> We are specifically talking about software patents. I think that should
> be the only realm we address.
>
> >
> > The bottom line is that for permanent content, you are going to have to
> > get super-majority agreement on all these issues in your statement, or
> > keep it narrow enough so you can get such a majority.
>
> So far only one person has said no (Neil). That is fairly clear to me.
What about Dave Page and me. I have seen perhaps 6 yes and 3 no. That
isn't enough, I think.
> > (Everytime I email about patents I am careful because I suspect my words
> > might be used against me some day in court, so I do try to avoid the
> > subject in public discourse if possible.)
>
> Well I have no such concern. Software patents are stupid. There only
> purpose is to generate protective revenue for corporations against the
> inspiring minds of others.
This is the simplistic approach I want to avoid.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
