Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 200505050917.55201.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> But packaging them as separately buildable tarballs that depend only
> on the installed core fileset (headers + pgxs) seems a fine idea.

I really can't see doing this without a better (i.e. CPAN / emerge / ports - 
like ) build system.    Mind you, I'd really like such a build system, but if 
we require users to manually download several separate tarballs and untar 
them in exactly the right spot in the source tree, we're adding a bunch of 
extra effort for both users and packagers.

Improving the download/build/install process needs to be part of "pushing out" 
any core stuff.   Of course, if we can make improvements, that could also 
lead to having an "all drivers" tarball that would build easily, and 
packaging other add-ons for easy build, which would be cool.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement