On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:30:20PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> I'd like to suggest altering the syntax of VACUUM so that it is possible
> to issue the command VACUUM DATABASE. The keyword DATABASE would be
> optional, to allow backward compatibility.
Huh, so why not have an optional LAZY?
I understand your concern against "VACUUM LAZY table", which is not
helpful -- so your advice would have to be rephrased as "issue a
database-wide lazy vacuum"
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Saca el libro que tu religión considere como el indicado para encontrar la
oración que traiga paz a tu alma. Luego rebootea el computador
y ve si funciona" (Carlos Duclós)
