On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:35:31PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> but it seems this is some BSD'ism that we don't need to support if the
> standard doesn't say so.
I think the Linux manpage is more informative about this:
The functions snprintf and vsnprintf do not write more than size bytes (including the trailing '\0'). If
theoutput was truncated due to this limit then the return value is the number of characters (not
includingthe trailing '\0') which would have been written to the final string if enough space had been available.
Thus,a return value of size or more means that the output was truncated. (See also below under NOTES.)
Ifan output error is encountered, a negative value is returned.
[...]
NOTES The glibc implementation of the functions snprintf() and vsnprintf() conforms to the C99 standard,
i.e.,behaves as described above, since glibc version 2.1. Until glibc 2.0.6 they would return -1 when the out-
put was truncated.
[...]
Concerning the return value of snprintf(), the SUSv2 and the C99 stan- dard contradict each other: when
snprintf()is called with size=0 then SUSv2 stipulates an unspecified return value less than 1, while C99
allowsstr to be NULL in this case, and gives the return value (as always) as the number of characters
thatwould have been written in case the output string has been large enough.
Kurt
