Re: [BUGS] Solaris cc compiler on amd: PostgreSQL does not - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [BUGS] Solaris cc compiler on amd: PostgreSQL does not
Date
Msg-id 20051220184217.GZ28771@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Solaris cc compiler on amd: PostgreSQL does not  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Looking before that, the 64-bit registers are now prefixed with 'r'
> > > instead of 'e', so what I did was to convert all the long/l assembler
> > > instructions to quad/64-bit/q, and rename the registers to use 64-bit
> > > versions. I also modified the function alignment from 4 to 8, patch
> > > attached.  Please give it a try and report back any error lines.
> >
> > Surely that breaks it for the i386 case --- don't we need a separate
> > solaris_x86_64.s source file?
>
> Yes, it is only for him to test.  But his email bounced back so it is
> possible he isn't going to be back.  :-(

Sorry, I don't remember the history of this thread, but I do have access
to solaris on an opteron if something needs to be tested.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore and fors stms
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY LOCK for WAL bypass