Re: bad performance on Solaris 10 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: bad performance on Solaris 10
Date
Msg-id 200604052132.16434.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad performance on Solaris 10  (Chris Mair <list@1006.org>)
List pgsql-performance
Chris,

> Remounting the fs where $PGDATA lives with "forcedirectio"
> (together with logging, that is default) did not help
> (if not harm...) performance.

Not all of PG.  JUST pg_xlog.  forcedirectio is only a good idea for the xlog.

> Quickly playing around with wal_buffers on Linux and Mac OS X
> I see it influences the performance of my test a bit, maybe in the
> 10-20% range (I'm really doing quick tests, nothing systematic),
> but nowhere near as spectacularly as on Solaris.
>
> I'm happy so far, but I find it very surprising that this single
> parameter has such an impact (only on) Solaris 10.

That *is* interesting.  I hadn't tested this previously specifically on
Solaris.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Juan Casero \(FL FLC\)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: bad performance on Solaris 10