Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Date
Msg-id 20060504210346.GK97354@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?  ("Tony Lausin" <tonylausin@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:15:25PM -0700, Tony Lausin wrote:
> My project is essentially a CMS, but there are features that are
> commonly found in social networking sites like MySpace and CampusHook.
> I prefer to call it a web-based BBS inspired by my Citadel days that
> borrows features from social networking sites and multi-user blog
> sites (think Slashdot, not LiveJournal or Blogger).

Cool. Bonus points if you figure out a way to allow people to bring
together blogs of friends that are on multiple sites with a seamless
interface.

> I don't anticipate the kind of usage that a site like MySpace gets;
> but should users really go for the social networking features, and
> start hammering away at profiles with comments and updates; I'd like
> to know that the database can survive.

If I had a dollar for everyone who started with MySQL because "it'll
only be a small site"...

> I read in a few places that vacuuming on a heavily hit site can be
> necessary several times a day; and so that has been my biggest concern
> with PostgreSQL. I haven't previously used autovacuum.

Autovacuum is your friend. I would suggest cutting all the threshold
values in half, though.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Leif B. Kristensen"
Date:
Subject: Re: psql is slow and it does not take much resources
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: psql is slow and it does not take much resources