Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
Date
Msg-id 20060531172459.GG23169@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
List pgsql-patches
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:14:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is it worth adding a module name to the magic block, or should we just
> leave well enough alone?  It's certainly not something foreseen as part
> of the purpose of that block.  In the absence of some fairly concrete
> ideas what to do with it, I'm probably going to vote keep-it-simple.

I actually considered it while writing the patch but decided against
given the general tendancy against putting extra info into the modules
in general...

Personally I think it's a good idea, except: where is this info going
to be displayed or used?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to -
Next
From: Joachim Wieland
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to - try2