Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2? - Mailing list pgsql-students
From | Tzahi Fadida |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200607291506.17407.Tzahi.ML@gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2? (Jim Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?
Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2? |
List | pgsql-students |
Practically i moved it to beta. I am still left to document the code better and perhaps improve the error messages and clean some code fragments but it is finished feature wise and i've done a lot of testing on it. Do you need anything from me to put it in contrib or you copy it directly from pgfoundry? On Saturday 29 July 2006 02:35, Jim Nasby wrote: > Sorry for the noise, but I haven't seen this on -patches. Is it in > now? Should we be extending feature freeze? > > On Jul 15, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote: > > My project is doing what it should do. Still missing one feature i > > want to > > enter before people will start to use it but other than that i > > tested it > > extensively. It can take a few days. > > still needs a lot of code clean ups and i need to move it from 8.1 > > dynamic loaded function interface to 8.2 > > but i am guessing it shouldn't be something difficult? > > The code cleanups and some more features will be finished by the end > > of soc. > > > > Is there anything else to do than just copying the files into contrib? > > > > Aside from the obvious full disjunction functionality i have a > > feeling people > > will benefit from the code itself as an example since it uses many > > aspects of > > postgresql. > > > > On Saturday 15 July 2006 22:50, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> SoC Mentors, > >> > >> Feature freeze is officially 2 weeks away. Just to check, are > >> there any > >> SoC projects which look to be both: > >> > >> a) generally applicable enough to be in 8.2, and > >> b) near-production quality by the end of SoC? > >> > >> We said at the beginning of SoC that we'd re-evaluate near feature > >> freeze > >> time if we wanted to wait for an SoC feature; is there anything? > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Tzahi. > > -- > > Tzahi Fadida > > Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info > > WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at > > http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > > -- > Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com > Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 > vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match -- Regards, Tzahi. -- Tzahi Fadida Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
pgsql-students by date: