Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> On 3-Aug-06, at 6:14 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>
> > Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> >> If that's the case then the driver is not doing what it's supposed
> >> to be doing. It should be using the named portal (S_3) to do the
> >> insert.
> >
> > No, the driver is fine. It is using a named statement (S_3) but an
> > unnamed portal (because it is going to fetch all the data in one go
> > and doesn't need to retain the portal after execution)
> >
> > If your query met the conditions for using a portal-based
> > ResultSet, you'd see it use a named portal as well as a named
> > statement.
>
> Thanks for clarifying that Oliver, the logs are still misleading in
> that they don't name the statement used in the bind message.
Current CVS has:
(errmsg("statement: [protocol] <BIND> %s", portal_name)));
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
