Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Date
Msg-id 20060817143728.GL318@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> >
> >>Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading 
> >>doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at 
> >>all.
> >
> >Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> >either.  Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to revert
> >to the old way?
> 
> I'd vote for reverting to the old way. Anyone serious about hacking 
> should be on both lists.

+1

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "cache reference leak" and "problem in alloc set" warnings