On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:54:01AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >The encoding is set per-database. Even if you need UTF-8 to encode
> >user-supplied strings, there can still be many small ASCII fields in
> >the database. Country code, currency code etc.
>
> ISTM we should revisit this when we get per-column encoding.
I think that if SQL COLLATE gets in we'll get this almost for free.
Collation and charset are both properties of strings. Once you've got a
mechanism to know the collation of a string, you just attach the
charset to the same place. The only difference is that changing charsets
requires recoding, wheres changing collation does not.
I think it'd just become a special case of the Relabel node.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
