Tom, Merlin,
> > As far as the PR material goes, something like "advisory locks
> > incorporated into core" would be OK, but don't make it sound like
> > there was nothing there before ...
>
> ok, thats a good compromise.
Yes, although if I'm doing this for PR, I need to use language which is
standard in the industry or I won't be understood. What about
"high-concurrency pessimistic locking mechanism"?
I don't have a problem covering this in PR even though it's not really "new":
a) it's never been in our PR before;
b) while it's been available for 4+ versions, who knew about it?
c) we have a new refactored code and cleaned up API
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
