Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alan Hodgson
Subject Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)
Date
Msg-id 200609181401.03679@hal.medialogik.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Monday 18 September 2006 13:56, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
wrote:
> just another fyi, if you have a really big database, you can forget
> about doing pg_dump for backups (unless you really don't care about
> being x day or days behind)...you simply have to due some type of
> replication/failover strategy.  i would start with pitr.

And, of course, the biggest problem of all; upgrades.

--
Eat right. Exercise regularly. Die anyway.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuums on large busy databases