On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc Evans <Marc@SoftwareHackery.Com> writes:
>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> What do you mean by that exactly? The example you showed seems to be
>>> doing just what it's supposed to.
>
>> In the failure mode, the source_record column always has the value NULL,
>> regardless of any value specified in an insert.
>
> What insert command is being issued exactly, and from what source? I'm
> speculating about issues like stale plans or metadata caches, but you're
> not providing any information about where to look.
Sorry for being terse Tom. Here is the exact commands and responses:
insert into audit_logs (audit_log_type_id,source_record,audit_format_id) values (3,20,71);
INSERT 0 1
select * from audit_logs order by timestamp desc;
id | timestamp | notify_at | audit_log_type_id | sdp_id | customer_id |
customer_region_id| audit_format_id | msg_args
| arg_names | source_record
-------+----------------------------+----------------------------+-------------------+--------+-------------+--------------------+-----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+---------------
15646 | 2006-09-19 17:18:10.074006 | 2006-09-19 17:18:10.190341 | 3 | | |
| 71 | | |
update audit_logs set source_record = 10101 where id = 15646;
UPDATE 1
select * from audit_logs where id=15646;
id | timestamp | notify_at |
audit_log_type_id | sdp_id | customer_id | customer_region_id | audit_format_id | msg_args | arg_names | source_record
-------+----------------------------+----------------------------+-------------------+--------+-------------+--------------------+-----------------+----------+-----------+---------------
15646 | 2006-09-19 17:18:10.074006 | 2006-09-19 17:18:10.190341 | 3 | | |
| 71 | | | 10101
Does that help any?
- Marc