Re: On future conferences - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Subject | Re: On future conferences |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20060919212812.GC28987@nasby.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | On future conferences (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Responses |
Re: On future conferences
Re: On future conferences |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
How far off are we, money-wise? Is that the only thing holding this up? On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:56:19PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Hi all, > > Some of you will know that this summer's conference in Toronto was > mostly successful (we've been struggling with some blockers on > putting up all the conference materials, but I have been assured > several times that that state of affairs will end in the next few > days). Some of you will also know that we did some work to try to > find out what sort of future conference, if any, was desired by the > community. > > Based on the feedback we received, the community apparently wants a > combined user/hacker conference: that is, a conference that combines > the PostgreSQL-server developer tracks we saw at this year's > conference with some user-focussed items similar to what one might > find at typical database conferences for users. > > Such a conference is not free to put on, of course, and actually > requires a considerable amount of money in order to make it both > successful and accessible to community members. This year, we were > successful mostly because of the generosity of our many corporate > sponsors; we are thankful to them. This conference was necessarily > planned to be smaller than a combined conference would be, so we can > anticipate that a future conference would require more money than the > money required by the 2006 conference. > > Those who are in charge of the funds currently held by Software in > the Public Interest have a number of other projects besides a > conference they are hoping to support in the upcoming year. > Accordingly, the group has reached a consensus that 2007 is too soon > to plan to fund another conference. Accordingly, the 2006 conference > committee is not planning to try to organise a conference for 2007. > We believe that it would be in the best interests of everyone to plan > for a biennial conference, if we wish to have a repeating series, > rather than an annual one. So, in the unlikely event you were > holding your breath waiting for the announcement of next year's > conference, wait no more. > > Best regards, > Andrew Sullivan > (2006 PostgreSQL Summit committee chair) > > -- > Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca > Everything that happens in the world happens at some place. > --Jane Jacobs > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
pgsql-advocacy by date: